Close

Current Conditions
66 ° Partly Cloudy

Uncontrolled urban deer pose unacceptable risks

Editor:

The right to own private property is an inviolable guarantee in our Constitution. It is also protected by our local laws, which prohibit trespassing and vandalism.

If the epidemic trespass and vandalism by the uncontrolled urban deer population were being committed by marauding gangs of delinquents or bands of thugs, our property laws would be swiftly enforced. Why should wild animals be afforded greater leniency and fewer consequences than human, property taxpaying citizens?

It is past time for our city governments to apply human intelligence and take decisive action against the invading force that is challenging the American right (a man’s home is his castle) to the sanctity of private property.

Even more critical should be government’s role in protecting the life and limb of its citizenry. Though we insist upon safety town to teach our small children the dangers of darting into traffic, we do nothing to keep the thousands of urban deer from galloping across our city streets, often after dark.

What will it take: The death or maiming of a high- profile individual, of a teen coming home from football, of a 5-year-old on the way to visit grandma or a senior citizen returning from bingo, to draw proper attention to this serious hazard in our community?

Nationally, there are 1.6 million crashes per year involving deer; 200 people die and tens of thousands are injured. The average deer/car crash causes $3,100 in automobile damage. The urban deer population, unchecked, is growing exponentially, causing ever-increasing risk for human harm.

Conversely, as one deer activist wrote, “Accidents end in pain and death for 10 percent of the deer.” How, then, can it be acceptable to those who love deer to even want them as urban dwellers, where the automobile is their ever-present enemy? The city is not a humane or proper habitat for large, wild animals.

Deer, though beautiful creatures, are also often infested with ticks, the vector in the transmission of Lyme disease, a debilitating and difficult-to-treat infectious disease.

Deer daily shed these ticks with which children, gardeners, backyard enthusiasts and their domesticated pets can come into contact. An exploding urban deer population only increases the risk of disease to humans.

We must prioritize human welfare. The geometrically growing urban herds will not simply go away. The natural life/death cycle is broken in the city, where there are no natural predators and where conscientious homeowners annually plant fresh landscaping for the deer to devour. The herds will only continue to multiply.

Our city governments must act now to remedy this identified and documented risk to human life and property. Continuing to ignore it is negligence.

Sylvester Nunweiler
Springville


ADD A COMMENT

You must be signed in to comment.

Click Here to create a Free Account

Click here to Sign in

Subject
Comments
Submit

2014-04-27 | 11:51:31
Uncontrollable urban deer pose unacceptable risks
Deer are creatures who have been in nature for all generations and before we came here your land was their home they have no boundaries. How ridiculous it is to suppose the deer will know why they cannot go on your land. Put up a fence around your property. All nature was never asked if you could build on their home. We expect them to stay out of roads, orchards, cornfields, towns etc. Their places to roam are getting smaller and smaller. Why can't we worry about laws and what is going on in Government which are real issues and leave the deer to themselves.
2014-05-02 | 13:48:28
To the previous commenter - you ask why we cannot leave the deer to themselves. Apparently you have not read the letter that explains that deer are a health hazard and a traffic hazard. Of course we all love the cute creatures, but they are not compatible with our dense population. It is really us versus them. Poison ivy and skunks were also here first. Sometimes we must control our beloved nature.